Passing Thoughts
May 13, 2008
  iiw6: lots I didn't know about identity!

Yesterday afternoon was a fascinating introduction to digital identity management. Today: discussions on creating "newbie" documentation to the field, interests of data silos, and shortly: videos, use cases, sandbox development, and more!

I'm going to take things a bit out of order here. First speaker: Ryan Jenssen, who has a very informative blog that's been tracking this space for the last 6 months. He provided a very nice overview of digital ID management, pointing out that our digital ID is "the stuff you assert about yourself."

There are site-centered and user-driven identities that you use to establish an "account" with entities that you want a relationship with. The biggest problems include 1) the need to repeat information each time, 2) managing our multiple identities and personas, and 3) each entity you connect to may not have any need or desire to protect your information. More of me in more places, shared with more entities.

In the case of a user-driven ID, sites can vouch for their users to other sites (relevant terms: identity providers, relying parties--good def needed). Your identity has several aspects: you connect with your friends, you have specific preferences, you develop a reputation, and you have assets associated with who you are. Taking this one step further, your assets are related to you by a personal broadcast service, and your reputation becomes a reputation engine for recommendations.

Here's an overview of some of the players in the ID Commons space:

Major Players:OpenIDID-WSFiCards
Products:-SAML-
Projects:LID, Yadis, iNamesLiberty Alliance, ShibbolethPamela Project, Bandit, Higgins
Companies:NetMesh, JanRain, CordanceSun, Oracle, NTT Group, NovellMicrosoft, Novell, Parity

The challenges at this point come from people who use software, need to develop compelling business models or funding sources, and the need to respect the people who have been working in this field for a long time (foundations, early adopters and developers, etc.)

Ok, give me some time to digest this.

Labels: , , ,

 
Apr 23, 2008
  Web 2.0 Expo picture of the cat

O'Reilly recently convened the Web 2.0 Conference and Expo in San Francisco. I registered for the expo (a few pictures), attended a couple of sponsored sessions, and came away with two significant things: 1) I'm not missing much yet, and 2) a laser etching on my laptop (thanks Instructables!).

First off, the expo floor wasn't all that crowded so it was easy to make my way around. Secondly, I wasn't attending as an "enterprise" representative, which made my journey more strategic. Many of the booths on the expo floor were touting ways to "mash up" legacy systems to create new forms of data (e.g., reports previously unavailable) or to be the next "social" apps hosting platforms (e.g., hosting the corporate wiki). [Related post]

Here are my notes from crawling the expo floor. Note that I'm only commenting on a few of the companies that struck me. I missed a few, and avoided others. Such was my timeframe for this event.

That was a first pass at the expo floor. Next I ran to catch the OpenID sponsored session.

OpenID is promoted as a bridge to sharing. It's being engineered for adoption at an ID layer. Question about open sourcing, noted that it works well with Novell and others. Why relevant, why only authenticating? OpenID has been around for three years, OpenAuth is brand new and needs to focus on what it can enable: integrating contacts. Concerns expressed about it being hard to grasp. Challenge: user experience not optimal.

I asked about how this is taking back control of our IDs when each silo has its data and can gather additional intelligence about us by partnering with other data silos. The answer was largely about the inability to get any hosted service site to delete info on request (once you register, it's their data). Yeah, we know. Then how is it that openID will help me "manage" my identity?

The question remains. Back to the expo floor.

At this point, the expo hall closed. We were all shuffled out. Many of us went to see O'Reilly's keynote and the talks that followed. I have notes, but on re-read, they're pretty boring.

Clay Shirkey was the reason I stayed. My notes fail in light of his post of that talk.

That was a great way to end Day One.

As for day two, nothing really struck me. The sponsored session on "Creating a Social Network, It's Easy" seemed to be more about hiring the group than learning how. Afterwards I went to the women's networking event. I wasn't already part of the small leaning-together cliques and didn't find a conversational way in. So much for networking.

Labels: , , , , ,

 
Feb 29, 2008
  Happy Alternative Birthday Leap day is my alternative birthday. I use it for web sites that demand my birthday without offering any compelling need or reason. So for them, I wish myself a happy day today!

Labels: , , ,

 
Current and future affairs. Speculation. Ideas. Reviews.

Name: JudiC
Location: United States
Archives

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.